Got your attention, eh? So am I pro-looting or anti? Is that a stupid question or what–no, I’m not pro- looting. Having run my own shop and have worked with store owners who actually “put their business in the street,” by putting their trust and life savings out there, no. Yeah, and most of them are not covered for broken windows, have deductibles, etc. [To help them go to http://www.oaklandindiealliance.com/] It shouldn’t be the topic that causes us the most concern nor should it be championed. Oaklanders like folks in other cities need businesses and jobs, especially now.
Is Looting Strategic?
Okay, I’m almost done with talking about looting, but one more question, is it strategic? Does it demonstrate anger at businesses that have treated people in the community badly and so deserve to be looted? Clearly, that was true in the 60’s, likely not now.
The point among some intellectual revolutionaries may be the desire to “heigthen the contradictions” duh, haven’t they been heightened enough? Do we have to do that on the backs of workers and entrepreneurs? It’s not the worst thing, but here we are talking about it again. So I won’t say, “yeah, I understand the anger that leads people to do that, ” cause it depends on the people.
Now, can we talk about how to limit police power in our society?
It would seem that most thinking Americans and some whose thinking is very limited (even right-wingers are considering this) have figured out that militarizing the police and allowing them to act with impunity is wrong, stupid, and expensive. This weekend’s police overreaction may as well be titled the full employment for lawyers show. We can only imagine the huge sums that cities and states will be paying out while also dealing with economic disaster.
But first, I’ve gotta take a step back because I have read missives that say, oh but there are two sides to issues with the police. Two sides? No, police are not aside, they are government employees. They are not a class of people to be protected, they are folks who chose that job for whatever reason-some good, some bad.
No one who has the kind of power that police have should have that without stringent oversight. It’s not just the power of life and death and why do they have that anyway?-it’s the power over one’s everyday dignity. There is likely no Black person or Latinx (or many other poor and working-class folks) who have not had some kind of police threat flung at them when they least expected it. We rarely react as a society to that kind of mind-numbing-Jim-Crow-living kind of existence but it routinely sucks the lifeblood, the heart, and creativity out of whole communities
Our City Should be on Our Side
So, puh-leeze don’t give me that two sides thing, there are no sides, there is only the side, that of the citizen’s (not in Trumpian terms, nothing to do with papers) right to be protected from bad actors or from violations of the contract of a civilized society that no one should endure. [Which Trevor Noah just argued are regularly violated so why not violate the contract that says thou shalt not loot. True, but then we’re back to talking about that instead of police power in our society.]
Home of the Black Panthers
Here in Oakland, we have a long and storied legacy of police brutality, such that the Black Panther Party was founded here to defend the Black community from police-the original outside agitators-as the vast majority do not live in the cities they police. It has taken us decades to even acknowledge the severity of the problem. It has taken millions of dollars in lawsuits, federal oversight, and multiples of devastated families to begin to fix it.
But finally, we have evolved into the city with the most independent Police Commission in the country but despite that Measure LL altered the city’s charter, which dictates how we are governed, this administration stonewalled the Commission and continues to attempt to prevent that body from fulfilling their duties as stated in the charter-and the legislation to implement it.
This administration with the backing of Mayor Schaaf has denied the PC their staffing and independent counsel, and other aspects of that legislation like an independent Inspector General.
As a result of that and other tweaks that might clarify who is responsible for what, the Coalition for Police Accountability asked the City Council to consider putting those necessary fixes on the ballot. After much outreach and working with many community groups, councilmembers and the city attorney, a new measure for the November ballot was developed.
But under pressure from the Mayor who either misunderstands how the Commission is designed to operate-for instance, there is no way that the PC can or ever would want to control day-to-day operations but she did indeed warn her followers that that was on the table. It was not.
Martial Law Proposals?
Unfortunately, what was on the table went from a few items of clarification to an orgy of amendments including many that either reversed the charter measure’s independence or gave the police department broad powers never considered by any mayor or council before. Indeed, one amendment offered the power to the chief to unilaterally declare martial law for up to 60 days! That declaration could make this weekend’s nationwide overreactions look minor.
The Only Way Forward-No Impunity for Misdeeds
So here we are. We wrote and voted for the strongest police accountability body in the US, not as strong as it should be, but a clear step forward and it seems that some folks who are looking to climb the political career ladder hand-in-hand with law enforcement, just can’t wait to weaken it. Be ever vigilant and watch this page…
This article was written by Marilyn Albert, a retired Registered Nurse, and health care union activist, living in Richmond, California.
It is often said that events like the COVID19 pandemic open minds to bold ideas previously not accepted. We can see this every day — with both immediate and longer term solutions coming into clearer and clearer focus. We are also learning more about the crisis before the crisis — in the hospitals, nursing homes, working class communities, and especially among oppressed people.
Medicare for All pre-pandemic
Think back to the Presidential primary debates of three months ago and their frustrating discussion of Medicare for All. But then, exit polls in each primary, whether Sanders won or lost, showed a majority of Democratic voters favoring Medicare for All.
As COVID-19 has circled the world, the whole discussion about Medicare for All, single payer is shifting — as the people ask, how could this happen? How can we prevent it from happening again? When should publicly accountable government replace profit making? These are no longer theoretical questions. The utter failures of the profit-based health care system are right before our eyes every day.
The healthcare industry crashes
When the symptoms of the coronavirus appear, everyone is told, “don’t come to the Emergency Room! Call your doctor!” — which is correct, except that at least 25% of Americans do not have a primary care doctor they can just call. For those with underlying chronic conditions — the comorbidities that make the virus so dangerous — the COVID crisis has displaced their regular sources of care — doctors visits of all kinds have dropped precipitously, so the chronically ill may sicken more quickly, becoming much more vulnerable to the virus.
When we are so sick that we succeed in making our way into a hospital, we encounter an industry functioning very poorly. The whole idea of “surge capacity” in hospitals has been a joke for 30 years — the United States has the lowest number of hospital beds per capita than any other country. Ever expanding hospital networks, including those owned by private equity capital, are regularly closing unprofitable hospitals in both urban and rural areas, while simultaneously building brand new hospitals in well insured neighborhoods. Long standing hospitals have been subjected to continuous cuts of departments, units, and beds for 30 years. Patients lining hallways of ERs even for days was the crisis before the crisis — ER staffs have coped with this for many years. “Just in time staffing” of hospitals has been refined to the point where many nursing workers do not know their work schedule for the upcoming week. Newly minted registered nurses have trouble finding full time jobs.
Hospital systems have been in ruthless competition with each other for market share. Huge reductions in “covered lives,” as the insurers call them, resulting from the pandemic’s unemployment explosion, will further destabilize the hospitals’ finances. The bailout of the hospitals in the first round of COVID legislation has been turned over for administration to the biggest profit-making insurance company, United Health! How these funds will be used has been a mystery so far. Supposedly a lot of COVID care will be directly paid for by the government to the hospitals, but we don’t know yet how much of the cost of care will be billed to patients. Bills for critical care could be hundreds of thousands of dollars, and many ER bills will be unpaid by insurance companies because ER doctors have been moved out of hospital networks, again a product of private equity capital’s intrusion into health care. This is the cause of so-called surprise billing.
Another predictor of the private insurance based health system collapse is that private insurance premiums may increase by up to 40 percent after the pandemic.
As of mid-April, about 9,000 health care workers in the United States have been infected. We know many have died, as have transportation workers, grocery workers, and other “essential workers.” Some in the industry suspect that hospital managements are hoarding personal protective equipment and not distributing it to workers who need them immediately. This is consistent with how hospital managers have inured workers to worsening conditions for years, telling staff “this is only temporary, do the best you can” as they hope workers get used to it and save the hospital money long term.
10,000 residents of skilled nursing facilities are dead from the virus as of the last week of April. In California, 40 percent of COVID deaths have been attributed to elder care facilities. Seventy percent of nursing homes are run for profit, and many have been the sites of bitter union struggles. The vast majority have been chronically understaffed, with extremely high turnover rates. Before COVID, 400,000 residents died due to nursing home infections nationally every year. Even in unionized homes, one nursing assistant often cares for 15 patients during a shift. Family members who are accustomed to doing their own checking on conditions cannot go inside the facilities now.
In mid-April, we began learning of extremely high infection rates among both among symptomatic and asymptomatic residents and staff members in the few homes where everyone has been tested. Another big problem is that infectious and non-infected nursing home and rehabilitation residents are being mixed together, which will possibly prove disastrous. The Governors of California and Connecticut have called in the National Guard to do inspections, fast COVID testing, isolate the infectious, and care for the residents at risk. Governments cannot rely on reports filed by those eldercare facilities which are dishonest — which is way too many! More emergency action must be taken to save our elders at the epicenter of the crisis!
Emergency action needed on racism’s impact
Medical racism has been a crisis before this crisis. But the data we are seeing in recent weeks is shocking. Chicago, Louisiana, and Milwaukee are areas where the African American death rate is hugely higher than the percent of Black people in the general population, sometimes 40 to 70 percent of all total deaths! In South Carolina, where African Americans compose 27 percent of the population, they represent 55 percent of the COVID deaths. The death rate for Latinos in New York City is twice that of whites. The Navaho Nation ranks third in deaths following New York State and New Jersey.
The immigrant detention camps — hardly mentioned by the media lately — could be COVID breeding grounds. The immigrants must be moved into humane living conditions immediately.
Being in prison or a jail could be a death sentence, no matter why the incarcerated person is there or how short a time. The ACLU has done a study showing that mass incarceration will add 100,000 deaths unless there is substantial reduction of the jailed population immediately.
Dr. Fauci was wrong when he was asked about the racial disparities in the pandemic and he said nothing can be done right now to address this other than give everyone good care.
There are immediate steps which can be taken to reverse the death toll in oppressed communities and these steps must be called for! This is an area where the Medicare for All movement should coalition with community and worker leaders. Such steps include:
- Immediate expansion of Medicaid in the states which have refused to do it.
- Immediate COVID testing, and culturally competent COVID education in neighborhoods and workplaces where people are too crowded together.
- Emergency food distribution in food insecure communities.
- Early medical care when symptoms appear in the people, as well as voluntary, comfortable isolation of infectious persons, accompanied by continuous testing of their status.
- New plans of action for chronic illnesses to improve the peoples’ health as fast as possible. Hypertension, diabetes, and chronic lung and heart diseases must be addressed as an emergency.
Medicare for All, post-pandemic
Some economists predict 40 to 50 million people will lose their jobs as a result of the pandemic, losing their healthcare also. This makes the biggest anti-Medicare for All talking point — that everybody loves their employer-paid insurance — now practically useless to our opponents. People are convinced that we need universal health care not related to employment.
There is good news in two new polls. The first, done by Politico the last week of March, shows that from February to March, somewhat early in the pandemic in the U.S. — support for Medicare for All rose by 9 points. And that is following months of massive attacks on Medicare for All during Bernie Sanders’ primary campaign. The second poll, released by Hill-Harris on approximately April 24th, showed that 88 percent of Democrats favor Medicare for All. Biden is being told his previous position is politically untenable. Bernie Sanders and other progressive forces, are said to be in negotiation with Biden over his health care position in light of new levels of support for Medicare for All.
Our Medicare for All legislation in a new light
We can scroll through HR 1384, Congresswoman Jayapal’s Medicare for All Act of 2019, and see how each section of the bill now resonates with meaning in new ways:
- Everybody will be covered equally — the government will pay the bills — no premiums, deductibles and copays, which are the costs that are keeping people from presenting for care until they are extremely ill from COVID and cause people to delay care for chronic conditions.
- What has been sorely lacking in the United States — planning, cooperation, and coordination are fundamental to a single payer system. Everyone could choose their providers freely, with hospitals competing only on the basis of the quality of their care. Although most hospitals would still be privately owned under our current Medicare for All proposals, decisions about opening and closing hospitals would be made by the publicly accountable governing structures on a national, state, and regional basis, not by hospitals or their owners themselves.
- Long-term care will be a major benefit under Medicare for All, placed under public financing and control. Life care for our elders can be transformed under Medicare for All to being safe and enjoyable.
- Our single payer system would participate in a global public health network, likely led by the World Health Organization of the United Nations. Data collection from health facilities, universities, and localities would be uniformly collected by states and the Federal government, facilitating much more efficient medical research, absent any profit motive. Thus, American health research would be more sharable and useful to the rest of the world.
- A reserve army of health workers could be built. New types of health workers would be necessary in a single payer system — increased numbers of community level workers, greater numbers of home care workers, nurses, mental health and substance use counselors and especially, primary care doctors, would be needed and funded.
Another world is possible!
From our vantage point at the beginning of this pandemic, it is not hard to see how it would have been different if we had had a Medicare for All system before the virus arrived.
Thousands have probably died unnecessarily because of the Trump Administration’s malfeasance, corruption, and incompetence.
Now is our chance — if we act with confidence and sharpen our tactics — to convince the people to support publicly financed, accountable, unified, national health insurance — a big structural change, which could be one of many. Another world is possible with COVID19 and Donald Trump gone!